Enter the world of hi-tech mobile phones


probeep.com keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

vicodin  

In-Vehicle Cell Phone Use - Assessing Accident Risk

Mobile phone use in motor vehicles hasmotor vehicle. In light of the ongoing
increased at a remarkable rate over the pastresearch for, and by, the National Highway
15 years. Yet it is undeniable that utilizingTraffic Safety Administration ( we should at
a cell phone while driving can affect driverleast consider their policy on using cell
performance as it relates to the overall safephones while driving that states "The primary
operation of a vehicle. There are a number ofresponsibility of the driver is to operate a
things to consider in deciding whether themotor vehicle safely. The task of driving
trade off in convenience is worth therequires full attention and focus. Cell phone
potential risks associated with theuse can distract drivers from this task,
distraction created by a cell phone. Givenrisking harm to themselves and others.
the fact that the individual driver (and/orTherefore, the safest course of action is to
business owner) ultimately pays for therefrain from using a cell phone while
resulting consequences associated with andriving."
auto or truck accident (financial, emotional
and physical lose); it is prudent to seek outSource: Cellular Telecommunications &
relevant and reliable information in making aInternet  Association  (CTIA)
decision. In doing so, consider the source,
as well as the possible motivation behind theAccording to the CTIA, there are currently
information  provider.more than 218 million subscribed cell phone
users as of August 2006 (compared to some 4.3
Source:  US  Legislationmillion in 1990). Based on the extraordinary
growth of cellular phone industry and the
In the United States, there are currently noCTIA's advisory role, it may be of value to
federal laws prohibiting driving while usingthink about their point of view on this
a cell phone. In an earnest attempt to find atopic. In doing so, you might consider a
solution, some states (New Jersey, New York,document found on the CTIA's web site,
the District of Columbia, Connecticut andentitled "SafeDrivingTalkingPoints2" (created
pending in California) have passed lawsJune 6, 2006) that states "But for some
barring hand-held cell phone use whilereason, legislative efforts to prevent driver
driving. Typical fines range from $50 to $100distractions have been narrowly focused on
for drivers caught using a hand-held device.wireless phone use. According to government
While these lawmakers have the public's beststatistics and respected research studies,
interest at heart by levying fines, not allthis approach is well off point." Consider
entities weighing in on this subject arethat, there are more than 220 million
likely  to  have  the  same  incentive.vehicles on the road and a similar number of
cell phones subscribers. Based on the amount
Source:  Manufacturer  Researchof time customers might potentially spend
using their cell phones in vehicles, we would
As the result of an independent study (foundhope to find the CTIA an objective source.
on their web site in the form of a pressGiven the magnitude of the revenue at stake,
release), Plantronics, a manufacturer ofis a greater degree of scrutiny in order
headsets states, "71% of drivers steer morehere? Would the CTIA hold a different
accurately when using a headset with a mobileposition if they were liable, in part, for
phone". They point out that the study was todistracted  vehicle  accidents?
discover if a person using a mobile phone
improves driving if he or she uses a headset.Source: Leading Universities & Independent
Stephen Wilcox, Ph.D., Principal of DesignResearchers
Science (independent research firm) states,
"Driving with both hands on the wheel is theWhile there are a number of valuable studies
safest option for motorists who use mobileon this subject, the following are extensive
phones, and headsets are tools to enable thatresearch projects provided by highly
improvement." Considering the source, is thisaccredited  organizations:
statement characteristic of scientific
research? Is it objective and free of1) Virginia Tech Transportation Institute
marketing bias? Could it confuse individualsresearchers and the National Highway Traffic
into thinking that cell phones are safe asSafety Administration (NHTSA) tracked 100
long as you are hands-free? Additionally,cars and their drivers for a year; they
found toward the end of the press release, isdiscovered that talking on cell phones caused
a comment by a senior director of productmore crashes, near-crashes and other
marketing. Beth Johnson states, "It'sincidents than other distractions (100-Car
important to keep in mind that our study isNaturalistic  Driving  Study,  April  2006).
not intended to address the issue of whether
or not it is safe to talk on a mobile phone2) University of Utah researchers determined
while driving, but rather what type ofthat motorists on the blood-alcohol threshold
technology is safest for drivers to use whileof being legally drunk were able to drive
talking on their mobile phones". They alsobetter than sober cell phone using drivers. A
state their intent is to "educate drivers onkey researcher and author in this field,
options for using mobile phones comfortablyPsychology Professor David Strayer notes,
and responsibly while driving". Given that"Just like you put yourself and other people
the goal is safety education, is thisat risk when you drive drunk, you put
research responsibly comprehensive toyourself and others at risk when you use a
consider  it  a relevant and reliable source?cell phone and drive. The level of impairment
is very similar." Also, consider they found
Surely, as you go about your own assessmentmotorists to be more accident-prone and
the idea of freeing up both hands to controlslower to react when talking on cellular
the steering wheel is a logicaltelephones. It did not matter if it was
consideration. If a driver focuseshands-free either because of "inattention
exclusively on driving the vehicle, then twoblindness", a syndrome that makes a driver
hands on the wheel is better than one.less  able  to  process  visual  information.
Unfortunately, this seemingly sensible
approach can lead to a false sense of driver3) The George Institute for International
security (possibly increasing crash risk) asHealth (University of Sydney, Australia),
noted in various reports ( by the CrashInsurance Institute for Highway Safety
Investigation Team at Virginia Commonwealth(Arlington, Virginia) and Injury Research
University Center for Public Safety. TheirCentre, University of Western Australia
findings illustrated that the cognitive(Crawley Australia) jointly presented
resources required to carry on a phoneresearch entitled "Role of mobile phones in
conversation are equivalent to thosemotor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital
necessary to drive. This is an importantattendance: a case-crossover study". The
concern given VCU's history of transportationresearch consisted of 456 drivers aged 17
safety research, as well as other studiesyears who owned or used mobile phones and had
concluding this behavior (carrying on a phonebeen involved in road crashes requiring
conversation while driving), reduces bothhospital attendance between April 2002 and
driver reaction time and driverJuly 2004. They concluded that a driver who
attentiveness, especially as they relate touses a mobile phone (up to 10 minutes prior
braking.to a crash) has a four times higher
likelihood of crashing and an increased
Unlike a computer, humans have a limitedlikelihood of a crash resulting in injury.
capacity to process simultaneous information.Using  a  hands-free  phone is not any safer.
If the software on your computer seems to
slow down, you might consider increasing theEliminate  the  Risk  &  Keep  the  Benefits
memory or processor speed to compensate for
delays resulting from an overload inIf you are the head of a household, a
computing capacity. We as humans have aguardian or the parent of a less experienced
similar limitation when it comes todriver, your decision to allow any in-vehicle
processing too much information, but unlikecell phone use carries a major emotional and
computers, our resources are somewhat fixed.financial risk. If you are a fleet manager or
Given the inherent delays in our own thoughtyou employ individuals that conduct
response time when faced with increased loadwork-related conversations while driving, the
factors, is it practical or safe to hold arisk of liability for distracted accidents
cell phone conversation while driving a motorcould fall on you. Strongly consider the
vehicle?legal ramifications for the careless
operation of an employee-owned or
Source: Government Transportation Safetycompany-supplied vehicle before deciding to
Researchignore the inherent danger created by a major
cognitive  distraction  such as a cell phone.
The US government employs many of the top
transportation safety experts and funds aObviously, there are no easy or certain
major portion of the world's accidentsolutions without sacrifice of convenience.
prevention research. Given the effectsRemember that the benefit of having a cell
traffic accidents and related congestion havephone (emergency use and times when you are
on US productivity, accident reduction is anot operating a vehicle) is not lost just
top priority. Considering that distractedbecause it remains off while driving. If you
driving accounted for at least 6.4 percent ofconsider the facts presented by relevant and
crash fatalities in 2004 (U.S. Department ofreliable sources, it really is not a matter
Transportation), many researchers are lookingof a trade off after all, but an opportunity
closely at the distinguishing distractionto prevent an accident or possibly a
caused by cell phone use in vehicles.fatality. In the mean time, until it is
Furthermore, of the many potentialproven otherwise, think about instigating a
distractions in a vehicle, cell phones arelife saving strategy NOW for the safe use of
considered equally or more dangerous than thecell phones - limit yourself, loved ones and
other known distractions such as eating,employees to use (personal and business) only
reading a map or grooming while operating awhen the vehicle is in park!



1 A B C D E F G 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145